Most organizations have matured data governance (quality, ownership, catalogs) and are racing to formalize AI governance (risk, bias, safety, model monitoring). Application governance (SDLC, access, change control) keeps production systems stable.
But the layer where business decisions actually touch numbers—analytics—often sits in a gray zone. KPI definitions live in wikis, dashboards implement subtle variations of the “same” metric, and spreadsheets quietly fork the math. Analytics governance fills that gap: it is the set of controls, roles, artifacts, and workflows that make calculations consistent, auditable, and reusable across the enterprise.
The Information Governance Stack
A “stack” emphasizes how value flows upward from raw data to end‑user surfaces, with clear responsibilities at each layer. In practice, analytics and AI are sibling layers in the middle: both transform data into insights, but they manage different risks.
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Application Governance │ ← Delivery & change control for apps, BI, APIs
└───────────────┬──────────────────────────┘
│
┌─────────┴─────────┐
│ Analytics Gov │ ← Consistent metrics, logic, tests, versioning
│ AI Gov │ ← Model risk, fairness, monitoring, rollback
└─────────┬─────────┘
│
┌───────────────┴──────────────────────────┐
│ Data Governance │ ← Stewards, quality, security, lineage, retention
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘
- Data governance answers: Can I trust the inputs? It establishes meaning, quality, security, and lineage.
- Analytics governance answers: Are we doing the math the same way every time? It standardizes formulas, grains, filters, rounding, null handling, and release practices.
- AI governance answers: Are learning systems safe and controlled? It focuses on intended use, bias/fairness checks, evaluation, monitoring, and rollback.
- Application governance answers: Are we delivering all of the above reliably? It ensures access control, SDLC discipline, incident response, and SLOs.
Treating this as a stack clarifies handoffs: data governance stabilizes sources; analytics/AI governance control transformations; application governance governs delivery.
A Short History: From “Methods Books” to Metric Stores
Analytics governance is not a new invention with a new label—it’s the digital heir to a century of engineering rigor. Engineering‑focused companies kept reference books of approved calculation methods: the sanctioned way to compute stress loads, safety factors, tolerances, and conversions. Designers had to cite the method, show their work, and log revisions. In parallel, statisticians formalized statistical process control and programs like Six Sigma insisted that not just the data, but how you calculate capability indices and control limits, must be standardized.
Today’s equivalent looks different but serves the same purpose:
- The methods book becomes a metric catalog/semantic layer with authoritative, reusable definitions.
- The sign‑off becomes a pull request reviewed by metric stewards with automated checks.
- The approved formula becomes code + tests backed by golden datasets and expected outputs.
- The revision stamp becomes versioned releases with deprecation windows for downstream consumers.
Different tools; same objectives: safety, consistency, and speed.
What Analytics Governance Actually Governs
Analytics governance covers the journey from raw data to decision‑ready numbers. It creates a shared contract—human‑readable and machine‑readable—so producers and consumers agree on both meaning and method.
1) Metrics & Dimensions (the vocabulary and the math)
Governance removes ambiguity by fixing names, formulas, and behavior. One “Active Customer.” One “Net Revenue.” One “Lead Conversion Rate.” Each includes precise grain, filters, rounding, null rules, time zones/calendars, currency handling, and conformance to reference data and units. Without this, teams spend cycles debating numbers instead of acting on them.
2) Artifacts (evidence that travels with the metric)
Every governed metric carries:
- A spec (plain‑language business definition) and a contract (machine‑readable schema).
- A reference implementation (SQL/Python) that defines the single source of truth.
- Unit/property tests and golden datasets with expected results and tolerances.
- Lineage and owners so accountability and impact analysis are real.
These artifacts make logic portable across BI tools and durable across personnel changes.
3) Workflows & Controls (predictable change beats heroics)
Governance is a workflow, not a wiki. Changes follow intake → design → test → review → publish → monitor → retire. Separation of duties (author ≠ approver) prevents rubber‑stamping; evidence retention shows who approved what, when, and why; and service levels define freshness, incident response, and support expectations.
4) Surfaces (put the math where people work)
Governed logic must live in the places people actually consume it: BI semantic layers, governed datasets, and APIs for downstream applications, notebooks, or Power Platform solutions. In Data Vault 2.0, analytics governance bridges from Raw Vault to Business Vault rules and into Information Marts, making business logic explicit and testable rather than recopied.
Why This Layer Matters
Trust at scale. When “Revenue” means one thing everywhere, conversations shift from which number is right? to what will we do about it?
Speed with safety. Teams compose dashboards and features from certified blocks instead of reinventing logic. Change is faster because it’s predictable and versioned.
Auditability. You can show how a number was produced, by whom, and under which version—crucial for regulated domains and executive confidence.
Stronger AI. Consistent analytic features are reliable model inputs; many AI incidents trace back to inconsistent upstream calculations rather than exotic model failures.
An Operating Model That Scales (without bureaucracy)
The goal isn’t ceremony; it’s clear responsibility + automation.
Roles (explicit, lightweight)
- Metric Owner (business): Accountable for meaning and acceptance criteria—defines what “good” looks like.
- Metric Steward (analytics): Accountable for formula correctness, reference code, and tests—turns intent into reliable computation.
- Data Steward (data): Ensures upstream quality, lineage, and reference data—prevents garbage‑in.
- Release Manager (platform): Enforces gates and coordinates deployments—keeps releases boring.
- Risk/Compliance (as needed): Reviews changes with regulatory or reporting implications.
Lifecycle (from idea to retirement)
A small number of well‑defined stages keeps everyone aligned:
- Propose a change with spec, rationale, and use cases; scope grain and dimensions.
- Design the exact formula, filters, windowing, and time behavior (e.g., fiscal calendars).
- Test on golden datasets; write unit/property tests with expected results and tolerances.
- Review for correctness and compatibility; owners/stewards approve; automated checks must pass.
- Publish to the semantic layer/dataset; tag a version; update lineage and release notes.
- Monitor freshness, drift, and incidents; keep evidence of responses.
- Retire with a deprecation window and migration guidance; archive artifacts for audit.
Tooling Patterns (vendor‑neutral, principle‑first)
Tooling should reinforce the operating model—not define it.
- Catalog & glossary. Centralize metric names, definitions, owners, and lineage for discovery and accountability.
- Semantic layer / metric store. Maintain a single governed implementation and expose it to BI, notebooks, and apps; do not re‑implement per surface.
- Version control & CI. Store specs and code in Git; run tests on every change; block merges when checks fail.
- Observability & lineage. Monitor freshness, drift, and downstream usage; support impact analysis before changes land.
- Orchestration. Manage refresh schedules and dependencies; alert on failures or threshold breaches.
- Access control. Distinguish exploratory sandboxes from certified layers; gate who can modify governed assets.
In a Microsoft‑centric stack, this often maps to Purview (catalog/lineage), Power BI / Fabric semantic models as the metric layer, pipelines/notebooks for reference code and tests, and GitHub/Azure DevOps for versioning and CI. The principles are portable to any ecosystem.
How Analytics & AI Governance Work Together in the Stack
Analytics and AI governance share artifacts (specs, tests, lineage, versions) but manage different risks. The practical overlap is powerful:
- Upstream consistency. Feature stores should inherit governed definitions (e.g., how “active customer” is computed), avoiding shadow copies of business logic.
- Aligned monitoring. Metric drift and feature drift are related; monitoring both reduces time to root cause when numbers move unexpectedly.
- Clear boundaries. Analytics governance ensures calculation consistency; AI governance ensures model behavioraligns with intended use and policy.
Common Pitfalls—and How to Avoid Them
- Bureaucracy creep. If reviews feel like ceremony, teams route around them. Keep the lifecycle lean and let automation catch mechanical errors so humans focus on meaning.
- Shadow metrics. When the certified path is hard to use, people fork definitions. Publish a small set of certified metrics and make them the easiest path.
- Silent breaking changes. Undocumented tweaks erode trust. Use semantic versioning, deprecation windows, and proactive notifications to downstream owners.
- Spreadsheet bypasses. Analysts re‑compute logic when governed extracts and APIs are missing. Provide governed, well‑documented endpoints to remove the incentive to fork the math.
First Principles, Revisited
Analytics governance is not red tape; it is the modern form of those approved methods books that let engineers design bridges with confidence. We’re still doing the same thing: agreeing on the math, proving it works, and making it easy to reuse safely. When you place analytics governance correctly in the information governance stack—between data governance and the delivery layer, alongside AI governance—you unlock trustworthy decisions at scale.
EduDataSci - Educating the world about data and leadership 